Breaking News         Latest US News              New York News              Fx Tribune

Four Things You Need to Check on Your Car Before You Drive Again
In fact, the EU and the federal government have promised to make the work of secret arbitration courts more transparent. However, a study shows that the number of complaints is increasing.

Arbitration courts: secretly accusing himself 39; s still best

In fact, the EU and the federal government have promised to make the work of secret arbitration courts more transparent. However, a study shows that the number of complaints is increasing.

Arbitration courts: secretly accusing himself  39; s still best
In fact, EU and federal government have promised to make work of secret arbitration courts more transparent. However, a study shows that number of complaints is increasing. June 14th, 2018, 7:51 Uhr54 comments Content
  • Page 1 — secretly complains it's still best
  • Page 2 — Germany could get lightly of it
  • Read on a page

    It sounds like a story from gloomy past: corporations that sue countries before secret arbitration courts because y dislike ir policies. They get billions of euros in compensation because governments are capping energy prices, backing up companies ' support, or simply taking environmental protection more seriously and tightening laws.

    This was possible in past, because many commercial contracts granted such rights to foreign companies. During protests against planned European-American trade agreement TTIP and European-Canadian Ceta, such processes suddenly became a political issue – and federal government in Berlin and EU Commission in Brussels vowed to improve. In future, such procedures should only take place publicly, at least if y have anything to do with Europe. There should be independent judges who will soon be working on a (still to be created) International Court of Justice.

    A small, read-only study now shows that, despite promises, unfortunately so much has not changed. In paper that is published today and time online has already been available, Brussels lobby observers of organization CEO have gared many explosive data and cases. One should not be deterred by dramatic title, because in study it is meticulously demonstrated that so-called European Energy Charter continues to make it possible, which should not actually be: billions of expensive lawsuits by companies against Governments.

    Number of complaints drastically increased

    The Energy Charter is a treaty that European governments invented in 1990s. After end of cold War, it was to bind energy sectors of Independent States of Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to West – and to provide legal protection to expanding Western European energy companies for ir investments in east. In recent years, new countries have joined treaty, but at same time large law firms discovered it and sued on behalf of companies and not seldom financed by venture capital funds governments in west and east – if ir energy policy was not entirely Contract. In ir study, lobby observers of CEO note: While only 19 cases are known from first decade of Agreement (1998-2008), 75 new investor-state lawsuits have been filed alone in last five years (2013-2017). The real number is probably even higher because many procedures are not to be grasped because of secrecy.

    This is scandalous for several reasons. Firstly, because Treaty still makes it possible to negotiate beyond public sphere. Secondly, because it strongly restricts scope of governments if y want to reform ir energy policy. and thirdly, because it hinders a more environmentally friendly energy policy.

    Five before 8:00 subscribe to morning column of Time online – from Monday to Friday by email. Sign up now

    Italy, for example, was sued because it did not want to allow oil drilling in Adriatic for ecological reasons. Spain, because it cut subsidies for wind energy – for which government in financial crisis had been pushed by EU. Or Bulgaria, because it wanted to reduce exploding energy costs for consumers. Or Mongolia, because it had withdrawn a licence for Uraniumabbau after breach of security regulations.

    Even Germany has already met. On basis of Energy Charter, Swedish energy company Vattenfall sued federal government before an arbitration tribunal in Washington. Because of nuclear exit. Until last year, federal government has already cost this 12.6 million euros in legal fees. Until recently, it seemed as if Vattenfall could hope for a billion-dollar compensation. Meanwhile, however, it is becoming lightly that one could get away from it in Berlin.

    Breaking News Headlines

    CSIOS Corporation: The Cyber Insider Threat
    CSIOS Corporation: The Cyber Insider Threat
    The Top Five Telecommunication Companies in 2018!
    The Top Five Telecommunication Companies in 2018!
    Can an attorney help you with settling your car accident claim?
    Can an attorney help you with settling your car accident claim?
    Building Blocks of CRM: Focus on the Features that Matter
    Building Blocks of CRM: Focus on the Features that Matter
    How You Can Get Your Home Ready To Sell
    How You Can Get Your Home Ready To Sell
    New Essential Materials in the Automotive Industry
    New Essential Materials in the Automotive Industry
    What to Fix When Selling Your Home: 7 Things You Should Check and Repair Before Listing Your Property
    What to Fix When Selling Your Home: 7 Things You Should Check and Repair Before Listing Your Property
    Expecting for Your Second Baby - Know Hidden Facts Here!
    Expecting for Your Second Baby - Know Hidden Facts Here!
    Reasons to bet with Bet365
    Reasons to bet with Bet365
    5 Wonderful Ways to Explore Central Park
    5 Wonderful Ways to Explore Central Park
    Several facts about international shipping services
    Several facts about international shipping services
    Bank Accounts and their main differences
    Bank Accounts and their main differences
    POLLS Results ALL
    Who is the most powerful actor in Syria

    Front Pages
    • The Sun
    NEWS ARCHIVES