The Canary Islands, Galicia and the Valencian Community are the three regions more harmed by the Finance proposal to modify the calculation of the population adjusted in the reform of autonomic financing. This is how angel of the Source, Executive Director of the Foundation of Studies of Applied Economy (FEDEA) and one of the highest experts in the field, which also includes the Community of Madrid and Catalonia among the most damaged regions.
From the source he has published on Thursday the first studies with concrete figures and data carried out on the proposal of the Ministry that directs María Jesús Montero, and also concludes that Extremadura, Aragon and La Rioja are the main beneficiaries.
"In relation to the current system, Aragon and Extremadura would increase your spending needs by more than 7 points, thanks mainly to ad hoc corrections for fixed costs by segments and depopulation, Cantabria and La Rioja would win around five points by correction For fixed costs by sections and Canary Islands and Galicia would lose almost three points for a combination of factors, "explains the text.
Back comes the Valencian Community, with a loss of 1.7 points, a situation that contrasts with the satisfaction that the counselor of Hacienda Valencian, Vicent Soler, broadcast last Friday after knowing the Montero proposal.
"For the first time since the financing system was created in 2002, there is a proposal for the criteria based on the adjusted population, and especially based on demographic variables, which will allow us to end the current discrimination under Valencians" Solar said.
However, the figures from the source do not seem to be in line with regard to the counselor, and consulted by the world responsible for the document confirms that yes, the figures and accounts show that the model proposed by Finance in relation to the Population adjusted reduces the resources of the Valencian Community.
From the source also aim that the hacienda model respects, to a large extent, the proposal that the Committee of Experts for the revision of the autonomic financing of which he was part of herself in 2017. But it points two circumstances that he considers negative and that It means "to fall again into one of the most persistent vices: the tendency to try to make costumes tailored instead of looking for generally sensible distribution rules," he explains.
And he adds: "It is particularly about the peculiar distribution of blocks of fixed costs that is proposed and the introduction of a new depopulation variable that is conceptually unnecessary and is constructed ad hoc to primate certain regions."Date Of Update: 09 December 2021, 08:47