Maybe the judge will be a bit relieved that the trial before the Frankfurt court in the case of Alexander Falk finally over. You have already experienced a lot. You can almost do on a daily basis with capital crimes, a shock with a little and you are difficult to delude. But this process was different. A challenge from the legal, criminal legal terms anyway. It is not often that the search for truth is so tedious and the assessment of the evidence so contradictory and contested. However, the reason that made the workup of the case so nerve-wracking, even for its objectivity known to the presiding judge of the negotiations interrupted in order to preserve the peace, was a of other.
In the opinion of the Chairman of the appropriate words for the found what was doing in the court room, beyond the substantive discussion of mood. It would have shown strength, if he had taken during the process more often in this way, Falk's lawyers to the curb. Similarly, the Prosecutor would have done well to offer you the forehead. But who every Time he shows a broad chest, as the reaction undergoes an even greater escalation in an already lengthy process, decides at some point that breathing and holding back the better way.
hysteria and emotionality in the process
It is Falk's were lawyers who brought the hysteria and emotionality in the process, they accuse the other party more than once. You have the respect of the public Prosecutor and the chamber in such a way as to miss, as the Frankfurter justice system has long experienced. As the Chairman had to leave as "Mimosa stick equipped" refer, has been permanently suspended and should listen to again and again, the power of the judges was a Great trial chamber is not worthy of it. The Prosecutor's office was instructed in a tone, and declared incapable, that a dawned. Every opinion, every request was greeted with derision and Doubt of competence.
The legal team Falk's counted as a "media office": they sent press releases in the style of Manifestos, which took some of the Medium is one-to-one without being in the court have been. There were a few moments in the process, in which journalists put under pressure, and in your freedom felt by methods of this firm.Updated Date: 10 July 2020, 00:19