The Audience of Zaragoza rejects the resource of State advocacy to separate the popular accusations of 'Ghali case'

The Audience of Zaragoza has rejected the resource of the State's advocacy that was intended to separate from the case to the two popular accusations in the Gh

The Audience of Zaragoza rejects the resource of State advocacy to separate the popular accusations of 'Ghali case'

The Audience of Zaragoza has rejected the resource of the State's advocacy that was intended to separate from the case to the two popular accusations in the Ghali case, that is, the entry into Spain of Brahim Ghali, the leader of the Polisario Front, by Zaragoza. Likewise, they will not have to present a bond of 150,000 euros for personarming in the case.

The Magistrates of the Third Section of the Hearing have authorized "the formal requirement for the presentation of complaint" to the complaint that brought the lawyer Antonio Urdiales in the Court of Instruction 7 of Zaragoza by the alleged crimes of counterfeiting, prevarication and concealment. The magistrates believe that "there is no problem in considering that, in reality, the interposed was a complaint, although the title granted was different."

The accusation forming Mohamed Rachad Andalousi Ourighili and Juan Vicente Pérez, who submitted another complaint in the Court of Instruction 2 of Logroño and were also attached to the Court of Zaragoza.

The car does not share with the defense of the Camilo Villarino diplomat, former chief cabinet of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which is a "Procedural Fraud". In fact, they denounced a persecutable crime ex officio and the play of Logroño did not dismiss the complaint, but remitted it to the Court of Zaragoza and thus "it was not necessary to present the complaint."

Regarding the claim of the requirement of the deposit to the particular accusations in the case, the Audience of Zaragoza supports the Instructor Judge, Rafael Lasala, who denied that this amount was required to "promote" the exercise of criminal action and the Court respects this criterion.

Within the framework of its resolution, the Audiencia de Zaragoza has also spoken on the request of the advocacy of investigating the presumed filtrations carried out by the particular accusation.

In this case, the Court has rejected the pretension of legal services by considering that they did not employ the appropriate channel to raise the claim.

The judge in charge of the investigation dismissed the request by considering that there were no elements that demonstrated filtrations by the accusation exerted by urdiales.

However, magistrates agree that the attorney or prosecutor of any of the parties that unduly reveal the content of the summary will be corrected with a fine of 500 to 10,000 euros, and may also be incurred any other person who is not an official and comet the same lack .

The Court of Instruction Number 7 of Zaragoza for four months the entry into Spain of the leader of the Polisario Front, which landed on April 18 at the Zaragoza Air Base, without passing border controls or documentation.

From there he left in an ambulance to the San Pedro de Logroño Hospital and was admitted to the Health Center under the name of Mohamed Benbatoouche. The early morning of June 2, he left Spain to Algeria, after appearing before the Judge of the National Hearing Santiago Pedraz by several complaints presented against him for alleged violations of human rights in the Saharawi Refugee camps in Tinduf.

The instructor of the National Hearing did not issue any precautionary measure when seeing no signs of crime who aimed at Ghali.

Updated Date: 07 November 2021, 03:37

You need to login to comment.

Please register or login.

RELATED NEWS