The Court of Justice Room will meet this Thursday to resolve the resources presented by the independence leaders against the settlement acts where the bond claimed by the public resources assigned to the execution of policies is fixed by 5.4 million of external action of the Generalitat between the years 2011 and 2017.
The Supervisory Body communicated last June to the former presidents of Generalitat Artur Mas and Carles Puigdemont, former Vice President Catalan Oriol Junquerras, as well as another 31 extent Government, which is provisionally claimed a total of 5,422. 879.48 euros for the expenses of outsourcing of independence Procedure.
According to sources of the institution to the world, next Thursday the Magistrates José Manuel Suárez Robledano, María Antonia Lozano Álvarez and Felipe García Ortiz, members of the Justice Room, must deliberate and resolve the resources of the 1-or submitted leaders Against the instruction made by the organism itself - by the delegate Instructor Esperanza García-, where more than five million euros are claimed as accounting responsibility for the deviation of public funds during the Proceder. Will be rapporteur of the Mary Antonia Lozano resolution; In addition, the court is expected to give to know the agreed judgment that same day.
The Court of Auditors has opened an administrative procedure due to the supposed public funds diversion to the so-called 'Catalan embassies' and the Council of Public Diplomacy of Catalonia, known as "Diplocat", designed to promote the referendum of October 1, 2017 , which was declared illegal by the Constitutional Court.
In addition, the Justice Room will study the resources on Thursday the resources brought by the independence leaders against the decision of the Supreme Supervisory Body of the State to have transferred to the State Advocacy to issue a report on the guarantees submitted by the Generalitat, through of the Institut Català de Finances (ICF), for the payment of the aforementioned bond.
However, this second battery of resources - whose paper corresponds to Magistrate Felipe García Ortiz - have lost in the object practice, since last September the State Law informed that it declined to issue the aforementioned report since "the request for A report to one of the parties on issues that directly affect the interests of others may suggest the predisposition of the court to follow the criteria of that party. "
Since the Ministry of Justice, it was explained that if the legal services of the State issued its report "the principles of contradiction and equality would be affected, by requiring the report to one of the parent without hearing of others" the Court of Auditors. The reality is that with this maneuver the government dodged a conflict with the Government in full negotiation of the dialogue table and the general budgets of the State.
Date Of Update: 15 October 2021, 00:05
