"Juana Rivas freedom could suppose a serious danger to her children" and "this Court is not going to be a participant in that eventuality." This has answered the Magistrate holder of Criminal 1 of Granada to the request for suspension of its entry in prison by the Prosecutor's Office, after intervening the former Minister and Attorney General Dolores Delgado-according to 'the newspaper of Spain'- and twist the Criterion of the Provincial Prosecutor's Office, which was contrary to the request for this suspension to the pardon awarded by the Government.
Manuel Piñar's car, who fell to the executive having "replaced the judiciary" to avoid Rivas jail, gives a turning to the case, however, by alluding to one of the causes he refuses to suspend the Penalty: Piñar says there are "signs of sexual abuse to one of the minors when they were under the custody" of Rivas.
The textuality is ruled: "This Court," says the car, "he no longer knows how to get to the knowledge of the remaining courts, and of course the Government, who being the children under the care and custody of the mother, one of They were sexually abused, according to the pediatrician, a forensic and manifested the child himself. Meanwhile, soon to be found by these facts, the mother hides the children, precisely at the time when the presence of the child was essential for research . About this fact, it has been cast over and its transcendence has been ignored, under the appearance of being a victim of an abuser, when after the only condemnation, it is reconciled, conceivable another child without any accredited episodes of abuse ".
Holds the judge, who also ensures that Rivas "has not shown repentance", which, with respect to alleged abuses, "there are [in Rivas] indications of alleged negligence due to the obligation to ensure it, so, allowing him Free wandering with the child, can assume put a serious danger to him in disposal. "
The magistrate points out that "he was not even the mother" who denounced these facts, but "it was at the school of the minor where they made the decision to take him to the doctor," and that "he does not consist that he denounced that fact as expected in a Normal mother ". Remocha Piñar, on the public figure of Rivas: "That perspective of mother who fights for the children did not have a reflection in those concrete facts so serious acadeted with one of the minors."
"This fact," follows the magistrate, "has been an explicitly omitting for not affecting the minor's intimacy, but it must be exposed in the state to which the cause has come, as a true reason that creates distrust for the possibility of that the defendant can take advantage of any penitentiary benefit that implies full freedom of movement so that he returned to retain minors under his care It enables it, as far as the powers you have attributed. "
The magistrate ended: "With all the media contemplation of abused, a smoke curtain has been brought that hides a presumed serious offense of abuse to a minor, and there will always be a margin about whether the mother did everything she could discover that crime, because it was supposed to know where the child was when he could be abused, the people who could have access to him and, therefore, the circle of possible authors. "
Finally, he finishes the penalty judge 1 of Granada, another of the causes for which the suspension of the sentence is that Rivas "repeated the same behavior after being condemned in this cause and being minors in Italy."
Date Of Update: 10 December 2021, 12:27
