Volkswagen could possibly do more for education, said the presiding judge Stephan seiter. In the light of the messages of the group at 22. September 2015 and to the extensive media coverage that followed, it seems the Senate but do not assume that the buyer could have been completely innocent. Also in the second negotiated issue of whether a successful plaintiff can receive in addition to the compensation also the interest of VW, it is for Diesel owners bad.
Both rulings (Az. VI ZR 397/19, etc.) should no longer be Tuesday, but in the short term, announce on, like outsider said. When, exactly, was not clear initially. On Thursday, the Senate has scheduled the pronouncement of the judgment in two other Diesel cases.
to stop A VW spokeswoman said that the group remained committed to "the many with the principle of judgment comparable to that of procedure in agreement with the plaintiffs in a timely manner". To relieve wolledie justice "as soon as possible".
rescue by the ECJ?
From the point of view of some lawyers could, however, still a possibility of compensation claims to enforce."At the end of April, the General attorney of the European court of justice (ECJ) announced in a circuit application, that all of the vehicle functions as a illegal defeat devices, if they are in the Real lead to a higher exhaust gas emissions than to the test," commented the lawyer Claus gold stone of the law Firm goldenstein & Partner, the diesel scandal was in may 2020 for the first Supreme court ruling in the VW for a total of more than 21,000 clients in the thing it represents.
gold stone stressed on Tuesday that numerous tests have shown that the manipulated VW diesel vehicles after the implementation of the mandatory Software Updates are only at certain temperatures actually clean. Also in the framework of desSoftware-Updatesvon VWseialsoeineAbschalteinrichtungintegriert. This is called the thermal window is different, however, from the originally used manipulation software and apply, so far as not illegal – what will change as expected but soon, believes the lawyer.
So that the judges of the ECJ, the legal opinion of the General attorney to follow in your soon-to-be judgment.Then also re-used as a disconnection device from VW would be declared as illegal and could be affected holder of VW vehicles to enforce their rights accordingly,and your car only purchased in the year 2016oder even later.Updated Date: 28 July 2020, 16:19