Effective ways to cut back on excess spending
Life insurance providers are more likely to reduce their participation in the valuation reserves due to a reregulation. According to the Federal Court, practice is right.

BGH: Life insurance is allowed to pay less to customers

Life insurance providers are more likely to reduce their participation in the valuation reserves due to a reregulation. According to the Federal Court, practice is right.

BGH: Life insurance is allowed to pay less to customers

The new rules for participation of life insurance customers in so-called silent reserves in Insurance Contract Act are constitutional. This was decided by Federal Supreme Court in case of a customer whose participation had been massively reduced (AZ. IV ZR 201/17).

The decision was followed by a lawsuit by Covenant of insured (BdV), who wanted to ride more money for withdrawing customers of life insurance. The focus was on so-called valuation reserves, i.e. profits that insurance companies generate by investing ir customers ' money in capital market, mostly in fixed-income securities such as government bonds. Customers are involved in profits – according to BdV, however, not enough recently.

Background is a change of law from year 2014. At that time, legislator reacted to historically low interest rates, capped most of this particular payout and thus helped insurance industry to meet its guarantee commitments. The BdV, however, speaks of an "unconstitutional expropriation", since only those insured persons are guaranteed a certain amount, whose contracts continue to run longer. In order to ensure this, departing customer has to reduce participation in doubt.

148.95 instead of 2,821.35, 00 euro

As an example, consumer protectionists brought case of a customer of Victoria life insurance company belonging to Ergo group to supreme German civil judges. Instead of original 2,821.35, it had received only 148.95 euros from valuation reserves. For BdV, one case of many: "It is about billions in double-digit range that are to be withheld from insured," said CEO Axel Alterna, according to a communication.

The BGH judges only partially followed this view. As y had already seen in a previous hearing, y declared regulation to be constitutional – alleging but insurance industry for its intransparency. In future, companies will have to inform ir affected customers of any deviating sums, in such a way that it can be seen that reductions are actually justified by economic situation of insurance.

That is also why BGH rejected concrete lawsuit for life insurance of Victoria customer back to Düsseldorf district Court. The judges re should again look more closely at wher cuts were actually justified.

Publish Date : 28 Haziran 2018 Perşembe 12:02

Breaking News Headlines

Should England stick with Eddie Jones?
Should England stick with Eddie Jones?
7 Tips for Ensuring Entrepreneurial Success in Any Endeavor
7 Tips for Ensuring Entrepreneurial Success in Any Endeavor
The Benefits of iGaming Trade Shows & Conferences
The Benefits of iGaming Trade Shows & Conferences
10 Tips to Choose Online IAS Coaching
10 Tips to Choose Online IAS Coaching
5 Ways to Beat Seasonal Hay Fever
5 Ways to Beat Seasonal Hay Fever
5 benefits of eLearning for adult learners
5 benefits of eLearning for adult learners
Planning a Big Family Holiday: 5 Top Tips
Planning a Big Family Holiday: 5 Top Tips
MESSI BRINGS TEAMMATES TO TEARS WITH HIS SPEECH
MESSI BRINGS TEAMMATES TO TEARS WITH HIS SPEECH
How keeping cool before events can boost athletic performance
How keeping cool before events can boost athletic performance
Storage Problems? Think Divan!
Storage Problems? Think Divan!
10 Years on, Have We Increased Our Trust in Our Banks?
10 Years on, Have We Increased Our Trust in Our Banks?
The Rise of Esports Betting at Online Casinos
The Rise of Esports Betting at Online Casinos
POLLS Results ALL
Who is the most powerful actor in Syria

Front Pages
  • The Sun
NEWS ARCHIVES