volunteer.F. A. Z.
I've made a satirical number in the NDR, which was taken in interested circles, but seriously. Then I was invited. I wondered how such a number can be misunderstood. Actually, it was clear that I made about conspiracy ideologists funny. I saw this as an opportunity, as times go.
do you Know whether the organizers had seen the Video completely?
This is a good question. Probably you have not seen it completely, but only a part, and believed that this corresponds to the Beliefs that you have anyway. That I was one of those who are now converted are from the Mainstream over to the enlightened side of the force.
Have you spoken to the spot even longer with the people?
no, I'm gone. I had delivered my ordered mind post Yes time.
A discussion was not possible?
I can't answer That final. There are definitely some that can be very good to discuss, certainly, there are a few with whom you can't discuss. That is, as in many other fields also. My approach was to go on the stage and to enter into a stage of dialogue. The Whole thing was, Yes, speech is still a satirical action-and no party tags, after discussion with the base.
were you surprised by the response to your post?
Absolutely. I have done it as well as I could, but I have done in my career, to want things to predict. You think you something Big, and then no one is interested in. Or you do something because you simply desire it and then it finds a large Echo. This is not predictable and a good thing.
video of her performance, the audience, in some cases, very confused.
I think the people irritated by were. I have played with expectations, also things called that are represented on these Demos to cope. For example, the misconduct of the Robert Koch-Institute in the course of the pandemic. Then I took the exit and said: This info I got from the "mirror" and "time". Our media can not be directed so, as you claim. This was a Ride on the blade. Sense but the thing is, I'm a satirist, not an activist.Updated Date: 10 August 2020, 15:19