A nicely-recognized Russian opposition activist who was left in a vital situation this month right after an apparent poisoning has now left Russia for remedy abroad, his lawyer stated.
The case of Vladimir Kara-Murza attracted international focus and condemnation on Capitol Hill earlier this month when he was rushed to the hospital – poisoned, his medical doctors said, with an unknown substance.
It was the second time in two years that Kara-Murza – a veteran critic of Russian President Vladimir Putin – has been poisoned, and his colleagues have recommended it have to be linked to his activism.
This time Kara-Murza spent a week in important condition, on life assistance and kept in an artificial coma as physicians sought to clean his bloodstream of whatever could be poisoning him. Last week, he regained consciousness and on Sunday, Kara-Murza’s lawyer, Vadim Prokhorov, said that the activist was now being transferred abroad for rehabilitation.
In a statement posted on Facebook, Prokhorov did not say exactly where Kara-Murza was becoming transferred to, only saying it was “abroad."
As in the course of the 1st time, Kara-Murza’s physicians have been unable to say what he had been poisoned with or even to uncover any trace of it. The diagnosis presently is basically “acute intoxication by an unknown substance”, his wife, Evgenia Kara-Murza, mentioned.
Samples of his skin, nails and hair have been sent for testing by toxicology laboratories abroad, she said. Earlier tests two years ago have been unable to recognize the poison, even though a French lab identified traces of heavy metals in his bloodstream.
The motive for the poisoning is also murky. Evgenia Kara-Murza believes it need to be linked to her husband’s activism, but does not know what it could be especially.
But in Sunday’s statement, Kara-Murza’s lawyer mentioned he had pledged that he would not cease his opposition function in spite of the poisoning: “He unquestionably will continue to do what he has completed all these last years: activity directed towards the restoration of democracy in Russia.”
The case had attracted certain attention in the U.S. simply because it occurred to coincide with a Fox News Super Bowl interview with president Donald Trump in which he indicated he was unphased by the notion that Putin was “a killer”.
Asked by Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly why he respected Putin considering the fact that the Russian president was “a killer”, Trump replied: “We have a lot of killers too. What you think our nation is so innocent.”
Those comments prompted angry criticisms from some Democrats and Republicans who mentioned Trump was equating the U.S. with the authoritarian tactics utilised beneath Putin.
Sen. John McCain took to the home floor on Feb. 7 to condemn Vladimir Kara-Murza's poisoning and implicitly President Trump's comments.
"Vladimir knew there was no moral equivalence among the United States and Putin’s Russia," McCain stated of Vladimir Kara-Murza. "And anybody who would make such a suggestion maligns the character of our terrific nation and does a disservice to all these whose blood is on Putin’s hands.”
Some have recommended that Kara-Murza’s poisoning could be linked to his involvement in a campaign to market American sanctions legislation. He played a considerable function in lobbying Congress to pass the Magnitsky Act, a blacklist that targets Russian officials involved in the murder and its cover-up of Sergei Magnitsky, a lawyer who was killed by Russian police right after he uncovered a large tax fraud scheme linked to the major levels of the Russian state.
Kara-Murza had appeared repeatedly before Congress urging it to pass the legislation that was later broadened to include things like all human rights abusers in Russia.
On Sunday, Kara-Murza’s lawyer mentioned that his perform about the Magnitsky Act was thought of 1 of prospective lead to of the poisoning. In his statement, the lawyer said Kara-Murza would continue to work on the Magnitsky Act.
Our editors found this article on this site using Google and regenerated it for our readers.