The Federal Minister of justice turned. The pressure apparently became too large given the scale of violence against children and the dissemination of these atrocities on the Internet. Who is to say that the statutory provisions on the punishment of the offender, be sufficient? It is the task of the legislator to make an unworthy judgment on such acts. That may change if the situation worsens.
as well as Christine, the trivialising Lambrecht presents the end of the word "abuse" in question. Now, of course, serious crimes are punished hard. However, the international network of the perpetrators have not let them scare you. This is likely to remain so, if, for example, in future, the possession of child porn is punishable graphic Material as a crime.
Who should not fear to be caught, which is not also quenched. That can be punished, only those who get caught. Who would call now, a reflex only harsher penalties, the ""hides" the real pressure to act", said with the right of the Green. You ask, "to use all necessary tools and sharpening". However, the required strengthening of youth offices and the investigative authorities is also a substitute for action. The offender does not feel safe. You are it also. Because the investigators can't get to your data.
Here you have to decide, in fact, Dominated the fight against violence to children, data protection or not? It must be possible to do both the fundamental right to informational self – determination process, and to bring light in the darkest part of the network.Date Of Update: 02 July 2020, 08:20