Judgment of the constitutional Court: Something Special

No big deal: you can interpret the decision for access to inventory data from the point of view of the Federal constitutional court. There is no oral hearing ha

Judgment of the constitutional Court: Something Special

No big deal: you can interpret the decision for access to inventory data from the point of view of the Federal constitutional court. There is no oral hearing had been convened to announce because of the First Senate from his point of view, nothing much New, and the legislature was sloppy. However, the court has declared provisions only of the telecommunications act to be unconstitutional. As is so often the judges have approved the measure in principle, here are the information about the data in the case of telephone providers that you can query such data and reuse should actually be a matter of course. Both the Transmission of the data, as well as their retrieval may only be done on proportionate bases. This is also part of the Abc of the law: The state needs, in principle, an occasion and then it depends in each case on the size of the risk and of the protected legal interests. In order to work; that the legislator can regulate.

The rules just have to remain manageable. The principle of proportionality should already belong to the DNA of each state servant, has to do with interference. The legislator has to ensure that, in particular, the safety authorities can also act on a fixed and certain basis. And Karlsruhe, Germany must not forget that there is something Special to declare laws unconstitutional.

Date Of Update: 19 July 2020, 14:19