in Life, trying to pick some cheap political points, based on the pure error. The whole of the argument which is put forward in their article is based on a belief that the agency is in a court of law, which is, of course, is not the case. The department of education, in all its glory, but any one instance, has never been and will never be. It falls to our judiciary to decide what is legal or not.
Slöjförbud is completely legal and does not violate the freedom of religion. European court of human rights has held on a number of occasions, examined the ban on the veil in public educational activities, and each time come to the conclusion that there are no legal obstacles for the implementation of this.
It is both odd and a tad alarming that the high-level representatives of Life, has been so good on keeping track of how laws are made and how they are to be tested. Some other things you might not expect from a party that chose to support the much-criticized gymnasielagen.
Show stale values
The legal bit might be the thing that Centerpartisterna hang up their arguments – even if it is incorrect. Of greater concern, however, is what are the underlying values of this show. With the centre pushing for girls to be girls are separated, boys and girls, in spite of the age, who can count on both hands – is to be regarded as a sexual creature to be disguised. It is a great shame.
Recently, it was found that the city's largest mosque has announced to the public via its website, that the woman is not allowed to refuse the husband sexual intercourse
For us, this is a very easy tradeoff to make. In Sweden, all the boys and girls have just as much merit. They should not be forced to cover themselves just because their parents happen to be common misconceptions about the role of women in society.
If it's not similar to the demands of the men?
in addition, It is outrageous that the defence of the veil, by referring to the right to decide over their own bodies and how they dress. In this context, they forget to completely remove the enforced headscarf wearing, which are an annex of the thousands and thousands of children, young people and adults alike to this day. Nor do we ask the question, why is it only muslim women are affected by the requirements of the dress code. Boys and men are to be considered in the context of the age of majority.
It is the recognition of the cases in which the parents of the child have led the teachers to the live-broadcast of films on their children, not only so that they can assure themselves that they have not taken the veil. Recently it was discovered that in addition to the city's largest mosque has announced to the public via its website, that the woman is not allowed to refuse the husband sexual intercourse, and that she must ask permission before she leaves home. If there is a community Centre in order to defend and build, they are of course free to do so.
let's say a blank no to the religionsförtryck
on the other hand, see it as a matter of course, we're not going to have a community that's already at a young age, confirms, nourishes, and defends the repression carried out against women every day in the name of religion.
this is Sweden, and it enforces that we don't, our children's religious symbols, which refers to the oppression, control and subjugation. It should be self-evident, even for the Survivors. < / span> < / span>
the commissioner for the opposition, in Skurup municipality < / span>
a Member of the education council.
READ MORE: Add slöjförbudet, SD, you are not above the lawDate Of Update: 01 March 2020, 14:00