It may seem quite konspirationsteoretiskt to claim that they are influenced by the pressure from the politicians and the civil servants. Can something like this happen in the united states? We are so irreproachable system?
we're Sorry. I can't make someone else's interpretation. For what is happening now is that the administrative judge will become the final link in the chain of the Agency's army of lawyers is diligently soldered on for several years, cheered on by the ansvarsbefriade civil servants in the Swedish regions. In this chain, shackles us to Swedish patients, but the care that we have the right to work in other EU countries.
to the Right, to the EUROPEAN health care
in the past I have drawn the attention of the Agency's crusade against the patients who have applied for the reimbursement of EUROPEAN health care. The EUROPEAN union's patientrörlighetsdirektiv will give us a clear right to compensation in certain cases, a fantastic right. Thousands of people in sweden has over the years made use of high-quality cross-border healthcare, which is not given in Sweden.
in The case of, for example, höftpatienter. Many people have gone to countries such as austria, Belgium, and received a so-called surface replacement prostheses implanted, a tried and tested method, with more than 400,000 completed the intervention. It is thus avoided that the Swedish approach of total hip replacement surgery, which replaces the hollow of the thigh, and too often becomes one-handed after.
I, myself, am one of those who operated on me in Belgium. Now, I am without constraint. Of course, I had expected to receive the compensation from the Insurance for which I have a right to be, and like many others had before me that have done the exact same operation.
the Number of "prestige"
However, there is a big but.
as more and more made use of the EUROPEAN health care concerns have increased in the Swedish regions. The politicians and civil servants are in the Excel file. The cost to EUROPEAN health care. There is a barely detectable fraction of the whole of the vårdbudgeten, but it still seems to be something that they consider to be a huge problem.
In the meantime, we the patients of the first in sweden's long-term vårdkön. Despite the fact that we really have a right to something better. This is a photo.
In the best case scenario is that of a misplaced the care of the public purse. In the worst case, where the prestige which the administration does not tolerate that patients are turning away from american health care, with its well-known problems.
In fund mobilising to patients
Regardless of what the Officials set out in EU law. The location is very clear. Patientrörlighetsdirektivet states that the right of EU citizens to treatment in EU countries if the necessary conditions are met. The cost is irrelevant, as long as the treatment is not excessively expensive. In the case of the hip, in Belgium, the price tag is rather inexpensive in comparison with american treatment.
the Administration has found it easy to make the case for his policies, few seem to be familiar with the patientrörlighetsdirektivet. The social insurance agency has been told to put up the fight and is doing everything in order to say " no " to the remuneration report for the EUROPEAN care group. A lot of patients are being forced to fight in a court of law.
the judge's argument is a copy of F the fund's
But, unfortunately, it seems that officials on the campaign have become too powerful for the organisation of the administrative courts. One of the many examples is the fact that the Court has recently denied myself the allowance for the care of many others before me, I received a replacement for it. The judge's reasoning is in substance a copy of its argument that the Insurance's use in combat. A variety of legal gyrations, which has not been seen in the past, the lands of the chain, then welded it together, even if the treatment provided abroad, is a ”medically justifiable, appropriate and in accordance with science and proven experience,” I have a right to compensation for damages. And on and on.
I'll Write it in his / her own? Is it bad for me?
this isn't about me. I'm doing fine. I have had the opportunity to pay for the surgery on their own, even though I had to borrow money in order to be able to carry out my surgery in Belgium. However, there are many others who don't have opportunities. I have to debate for them, and anyone who may have EUROPEAN health care in the future.
Why are we going to finance this scheme?
It is ironic, then, that we are, through their taxes are funding is a system in which politicians and civil servants, in turn, fight us, the patients. Their point of view, have now pressed all the way into the councils of state.
it Will be? Of course not. We are going to hear the argument of ”accountability”, ”rule of law” and ”legal support”.
In the meantime, we the patients of the first in sweden's long-term vårdkön. Despite the fact that we really have a right to something better. This is a photo. < / span> < / span>
as an Actor
READ MORE: Sauk: social Insurance, setting us up in the silence. READ MORE: : Stefan Sauks criticism of the F-check-out policy. READ MORE: the Expert: the Sauks post, if the F fund is a non-expertUpdated Date: 09 March 2020, 06:00