Additional contribution increases significantly: Bundestag decides on financial injection for health insurance companies

The employees in Germany now have another item for which they will have to dig deeper into their pockets in the coming year.

Additional contribution increases significantly: Bundestag decides on financial injection for health insurance companies

The employees in Germany now have another item for which they will have to dig deeper into their pockets in the coming year. The Bundestag passes a law that will increase the average additional contribution by around 0.3 points. Criticism hailed from the opposition.

The members of the statutory health insurance companies have to adjust to higher contributions in the coming year. The Bundestag decided on a large cash injection to compensate for a deficit in the billions in the cash registers, which also includes an increase in the average additional contribution of probably 0.3 points. The total contribution could thus rise to an average of 16.2 percent. Health Minister Karl Lauterbach defended the law, which was approved with the votes of the coalition factions of the SPD, the Greens and the FDP. Criticism rained down from the opposition.

In the final debate, Lauterbach said that in view of the current crises, the promise that there would be no reductions in benefits for patients could be kept. At the same time, the contribution rate should increase "as little as necessary," according to the SPD politician.

The financial package, against which industry associations had protested for weeks, is intended to absorb a minus of 17 billion euros expected for 2023. This includes reducing financial reserves at the cash registers. The federal government will increase its usual subsidy of 14.5 billion euros to the statutory health insurance companies (GKV) in the coming year by two billion euros and will also grant a loan of one billion euros. Drug manufacturers and pharmacies are also used with higher discounts.

The opposition rejected the law. "They burden the contributors one-sidedly," said Union health expert Tino Sorge. It is "a problem shifting law". The CDU politician held Lauterbach responsible for the deficit because he had been at the table for projects of the previous black-red government.

Left MP Kathrin Vogler said the project should be called "GKV Financing Botch Law". She complained that the additional contributions were a particular burden on people who didn't know how to pay for energy and food anyway. Martin Sichert from the AfD reproached the coalition: "They are not behaving like a responsible government, but like a gang of thieves who are plundering and devastating the country."

Lauterbach said the law should also solve fundamental problems. In the future, pharmaceutical manufacturers would no longer be able to bring new drugs that have little or no additional benefit to the market at significantly higher prices. Extra remuneration for practices for new patients would not have proven itself and would be deleted. Higher fees are to be introduced as an incentive if patients can get specialist appointments more quickly. This is "a step towards dismantling the two-tier medicine," said Lauterbach, with a view to statutory and privately insured patients.

The package also includes a higher additional contribution. So far, the average rate that the ministry sets annually for guidance is 1.3 percent. For 2023, an increase of 0.3 points is "currently not unrealistic," it said. However, the insurance companies themselves determine the specific amount of the additional contribution for their insured persons - they can deviate from the average. The total contribution also includes the general rate of 14.6 percent of gross wages.

Irrespective of the GKV stabilization, it should also become more expensive for many private patients next year. The amounts would increase by an average of three percent in 2023, according to the private health insurance association. About 35 percent of the insured are affected by increases. The triggers are rising costs for treatments and medicines as well as reduced investment income due to low interest rates. A significant part of the higher contributions should flow into the pension fund to finance health care costs in old age.