Murder of Walter Lübcke: The boundaries of the court

the process to the murder of Walter Lübcke begins When on this Tuesday morning in Frankfurt at 10 am, then it is important, even if it is difficult for many may

Murder of Walter Lübcke: The boundaries of the court

the process to the murder of Walter Lübcke begins When on this Tuesday morning in Frankfurt at 10 am, then it is important, even if it is difficult for many may be to focus on the core of what it is. A politician died because he stood up for the refugees. He was killed in his home with a shot to the head. Responsible for two extreme Right-wing are to the satisfaction of the office of the attorney General, the Lübcke as a symbolic figure saw for an odious development that they wanted to fight. The Federal court of justice saw it so far in his decisions.

As always in such processes, the hustle and bustle and distraction that take place all around and also in front of the courtroom, no Stop to be a lot of attention to themselves. Just to the first process days it's often a matter of interpretation. Images that are generated. Feelings to be conveyed. Sometimes those seem to get the biggest stage, the loudest or the most spectacular actions will bring, All this is true, it is in this process to observe the start and to classify it.

Out of sight

lost Who is looking but with some distance to the murder of Walter Lübcke and the possible failures of the Hessian Constitution protection, the one thing is clear: Right-wing networks are in Germany a reality. They are dangerous and ready to strike. With the NSU process a lot of hope for enlightenment and Reform was associated. However, the case Lübcke shows how far the way is and how much stronger efforts need to be, with the help of which the scene is observed. The state has lost Stephan E., and Markus H. from the eyes. He thought them to be harmless or at least not taken seriously enough. That's about it.

It is now but not alone at the top of the land court to clear this up and to draw the consequences. To make such a, is not the task of judges. Your contribution is, the case, to penetrate and to speak a sentence. Sure misconduct of the constitutional protection will come to the language. But no one should believe that the decision on the guilt of the accused anything done would be. The real challenge then: To prevent the back out of hatred and incitement to murder is.

Updated Date: 16 June 2020, 23:19

You need to login to comment.

Please register or login.

RELATED NEWS