"I call on the parties of the majority, Renaissance, Horizon, MoDem, to unite to defend the pension reform", insisted the Minister of Economy, Bruno Le Maire, in the Journal du Dimanche (JDD), at a few days before the examination of the bill in public session in the National Assembly, Monday, February 6.
If the time has come for mobilization, it is because the government can only rely on 249 deputies in the National Assembly, or forty votes less than the absolute majority. In the absence of these, the Macronist deputies are counting on the support of the Republicans (LR), for the adoption of the text in the Hemicycle and in the Senate, chambers mainly from the center and from the right. But nothing is certain for the time being for the majority who could have to deal with the refusal of certain LR deputies, or even with defections in their ranks.
Several scenarios are possible:
This is the most favorable scenario for the government: 249 majority deputies (Renaissance, Horizon, MoDem) and 62 LR deputies allied to vote for the pension reform represent a comfortable majority: 311 votes out of 577.
Basically, it is not surprising that the two parties agree on this project. Since 2018, LR senators have wanted to reform the current pension system by, in particular, pushing back the legal retirement age currently set at 62 and accelerating the extension of the contribution period. Nevertheless, the right-wing party is more in favor of a postponement to 64 rather than 65 as envisaged by the government. To ensure its support, the executive finally conceded on this point.
To ensure the support of the right, the government has already made some concessions by setting the legal retirement age at 64 instead of 65 and by extending to current retirees the revaluation of the smallest pensions for full careers. This alliance of circumstance was formalized at the beginning of January. “The budgetary, demographic and economic situation imposes this reform,” Eric Ciotti, the president of the right-wing party, told the JDD.
For the government, the room for maneuver is small. Twenty-three defections in the ranks of the majority and LR would suffice for the adoption of the measure at first reading in the National Assembly to be mathematically impossible. Between twenty and thirty elected representatives of this circumstantial majority say that they will not vote for the text, according to various counts made by the media (Liberation and Radio France). Counts to be considered, however, with all the necessary precautions, as the positions can vary.
The future of the reform at the Palais-Bourbon could therefore be decided by a few votes. Aware of their strategic role, some right-wing elected officials have expressed clear demands, such as the vote for an amendment so that "all those who are at least a quarter before (...) 21 can leave before the legal age as soon as 'They all have their quarters, without a discount,' explains the elected LR of Pas-de-Calais, Pierre-Henri Dumont, at the microphone of RMC.
The leader of the LR group in the Assembly, Olivier Marleix, insists: “I am not giving the government a blank check (…). We are counting on the fact that it will be amended as requested. The bill is in the Social Affairs Committee until Wednesday February 2 and amendments will be examined and voted on in public session from February 6.
If it fails to convince the deputies, the government still has an option, by now well known: the recourse to 49.3. This article of the Constitution allows the Prime Minister to "engage the responsibility of the government before the National Assembly".
If the head of government initiates this procedure, the deputies have the possibility of filing a motion of censure in stride. If it is supported by the majority of the deputies, the bill is rejected and the government is overthrown. Otherwise, the text is adopted and goes to the Senate for consideration.
Elisabeth Borne has already used this constitutional weapon ten times to get the various parts of the State budget and Social Security adopted in the fall, which had already been decried as a "forced passage" by the opposition of left and extreme right. The risk is to increase an already strong social mobilization – between 1.2 million and 2 million for the first demonstration.
Less known and less brutal in appearance than 49.3, another tool of the Constitution could be used by the government: article 47.1, reserved for budgetary texts. This is good because the pension reform is precisely presented in the form of a bill for the amending financing of Social Security (PLFSSR). This article limits the examination of the text by the Parliament to fifty days. If the discussions exceed this duration, "the provisions of the draft may be implemented by ordinance".
The deputies have twenty days to decide on the first reading before the text passes into the hands of the senators who themselves have fifteen days. Failing agreement, a joint joint commission, composed of seven deputies and seven senators, is formed for an additional fifteen days. Parliamentarians therefore have until March 26.
But several constitutionalists warn about the use of this article, and the risks that the law will be partially censored by the Constitutional Council.
Section 47.1 is originally intended for initial funding bills that are considered in the fall. It is then urgent to vote a budget before the end of the year to ensure the payment of benefits. In the case of pension reform, the need to act quickly is not obvious: "No urgency", estimates Benjamin Morel, lecturer in public law, in a forum in Le Monde.
In addition, a PLFSS should only include financial provisions. According to Le Canard enchaîné, Laurent Fabius, President of the Constitutional Council, warned that: “(…) anything that is outside the financial field can be considered as a “budget rider” [unrelated to the bill], and, in this case, a second text would be needed. “He cites in particular the employment index for seniors or the modifications of arduousness criteria among the measures which could be censored.
This is arguably the most unlikely scenario. The New People's Ecological and Social Union (Nupes) and the National Rally (RN) each tabled a referendum motion, that is to say a request to organize a referendum on the bill . On Tuesday January 31, the Conference of Presidents of the Assembly chose, by lot, that only that of the RN of Jordan Bardella will be debated in the Hemicycle on February 6.
However, its implementation is subject to such conditions that it is almost unthinkable that the motion will succeed. Concretely, in public session of the PLFSSR the deputies will have to vote on this motion. If there is a majority of the votes (which implies that the Nupes votes for the RN motion), the discussions in the Assembly are suspended and the motion is transmitted to the Senate (acquired to the Republicans, therefore a priori unfavorable to this idea) who has thirty days to adopt it. If approved by both chambers of Parliament, it is up to the President of the Republic to submit a referendum, under Article 11 of the Constitution. But nothing forces it.
