You Nuhrs Statement, the DFG had, on 21. July taken, and with him thank. 30. July, you've advertised the post on Twitter. Then, there is an intense debate, with the participation of representatives of science have involved.To mean, "your Regret", the statement continues, "saw the DFG will be able, in the short term and during a part of aggressive Twitter discussion, with a clear assessment of the comments made."
On December 31. July, you've decided to take the post from the campaign page, "without further explanation and without prior Information to Mr. Nuhr", what you regret and what are you sorry for Dieter Nuhr. So you have to want to be his "personal attitude to science", not rate. On Twitter, the post was also more available.
"background research" had, however, revealed that only announces the phrases "science is not a doctrine of salvation, not a Religion, the absolute truth. And who calls constantly ,Follow the science!‘, has not understood, obviously,“ similarly, in the climate debate, and Greta Thunberg had expressed. To relate this debate to not be the aim of the DFG-campaign. Dieter Nuhr, you offer a "in the light of the current debate on commenting Again-Online-the time of his Statements, not least, to the discussion, to keep open".Updated Date: 04 August 2020, 19:19