Kevin Federline, Britney Spears' ex-husband, nobody would know this name if Spears was not added. He used to dance behind the world-famous singer's buttocks, which were already half-naked at the time. He then worked his way up from the background and became her husband and father of two sons from 2004 to 2007. Almost twenty years ago, the world held its breath and wondered if he just wanted their money. Almost two decades later, this question still arises, because now he's dancing on her nose. The former dancer has now given an interview and even beat his ex-wife in the dirt with a moral club.
In his capacity as Britney Spears' ex-husband, he recently appeared on ITV and heavily criticized Spears. He explained that the two sons had a big problem with Britney Spears showing herself half-naked on her social media platforms: "Seeing her like that is hard for the boys," he said. He presented himself as a caring father. He tries to explain to the sons that maybe it's just another way of expressing himself. "But that doesn't change the fact of what it's doing to them," Federline said. We are talking about the sons Sean Preston, 16 years old and Jayden James, 15 years old. Spears and her husband Sam Asghari immediately took a position on Instagram. The singer once again opened up about how it felt to not be in control of her own life under her father's tutelage for 13 years.
The sons, who Federline says are exposed to their mother's nudity at their high school, are at an age when boys are discovering their own sexuality. Federline forgets one thing in his latest TV appearance: This nudity financed him and their sons for the last two decades. Spears reportedly pays her ex-husband $20,000 a month in child support. There is a suspicion that as the two boys grow up, Federline will soon no longer be able to earn maintenance or that the subsidy will go directly to the two sons, meaning that the former dancer will also have to go back to work. A fact that Sam Asghari criticized in his statement on Instagram that Federline was "not a working role model" for the children.
In the interview series, he is said to have talked about the turbulent relationship between him and Spears and his reality as her husband, even though he was silent for years. So why spontaneously resurrecting his Britney Spears ex-husband card if not for fear of having to work for his own money soon. Britney Spears' own family did the same. For decades, they participated in the singer's millions. At the latest when the financial injections ended, they wrote books, gave interviews and appeared in podcasts. Above all, Spears' mother and her sister. Always in the context of her famous family member, of course.
But back to Kevin Federline's allegation. Britney Spears is a world star who is just 40 years young. She is physically, you might think, in the best shape of her life, she trains hard, has been able to regain her right to self-determination. She has finally married her longtime boyfriend Sam and is enjoying life. For what reason should one blame the singer for posting her revealing pictures? All her life she stood in skimpy lingerie on stages all over the world. Even before Federline, he even got to know her that way. The hypocrisy of the former celebrity husband can hardly be surpassed in terms of audacity, because it is precisely this nudity that still finances him. And maybe the former dancer has forgotten, but Spears even appeared naked and pregnant on a magazine cover at the time of their relationship. Federline didn't seem to have had any problems with that in 2006, perhaps because he was closer to the source of income for the shoot at the time.
