the widely held view that the government was a really stupid idea, as it would be in our trade to pay a 3 kronor a tax on thin plastic bags (30 cents for the small packing of the fruit in).
in Fact, there was a heated battle already in it, as soon as the argument is more about the bags that are klimatvärst – plastics, bio-plastics, paper, or cloth.
the Battle continued on the debattsidor in all forms of media. Once saw someone with a plastic bag lie down and the litter in the countryside last? Or in the Baltic sea? It is not we who are guilty, if the birds are eating the plastic and dying.
and They say there's fewer and fewer plastic bags are actually one of the EU's decision, which came into being in order to reduce the plastic waste in the Mediterranean sea. The swedes might as well just have gone with it.
but the Swedish federation of Trade has been of errors is that the EU wanted to save the Mediterranean sea.
Other critics have been wrong about that, it would have to be a klimatreform.
We are selling of plastic waste
In Europe, we produce more than 50 million tons of new plastic every year. Only 9% is recovered. A lot of plastic ends up in seas and oceans.
(The English) in favour of the scheme, you are quite right that it's not the sea that's the problem. Not in the Mediterranean sea, either. It is världsoceanerna, which are filled with plastic waste.
but what do we swedes have to do with it, we're as easy to throw the plastic bag into the garbage when we used it?
and Then, perhaps, we have turned a blind eye when a little bit of what happened in the case of the plastics which would be recycled for the world's oceans, is still now full of misery, and of a profitable, illegal trade, living in the waste plastics.
Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam (known for the dumping of hundreds of thousands of tons of plastics straight into the ocean), jumped first, happy at the chance to take over, but the sheer amount was soon to be too difficult. In July 2018, the hit the brake pedal.
Poland, the Baltic states, as well as it has, nor the desire to continue to receive the message.< Plastavgift directly to the EUROPEAN union?
In the entry to the EU. The first outlawed in the EU, straws, and other bits of plastic, from now on, all EU citizens, the number of thin plastic bags (not exceeding 40 a year, by the year 2025. In Sweden, we are approximately 90).
Everyone can see that there can never be enough to solve the plastproblemet. So, expect more and more plastlagar is on the move – stupid or not.
this is A proposal, the fact that the pop-up, A cancellation fee of the plastic packaging that is not recycled.
as An additional fiffighet is that the charge does not go to the new member states (with the plastic bag), but directly in the checkout process. The sum is said to even be able to cover, so there is a two-thirds majority of the exposure occurs in the EU budget the Uk's contribution fall by the wayside.
it could kill Two birds with one stone? Or is plastskatt worse than plastpåsavgiften?
so we have to think of your own, the better ideas into the EUROPEAN debate in order to solve the plastproblemet. If we are still paying for the membership in the EUROPEAN union, why not take advantage of it, to be part of the debate BEFORE decisions are taken.< Updated Date: 29 February 2020, 09:00