The Union braces itself against the planned citizens' allowance, which it considers "socially unjust". The Union-led countries in the Bundesrat only want to agree to an increase in the standard rate on January 1st. FDP Vice Vogel explains why his party considers the project important.
In view of the Union's fierce criticism of the planned citizens' allowance, the deputy FDP chairman Johannes Vogel pointed out the planned performance incentives through the reform. "The basic income has a strong liberal core - and that is the stronger work and performance incentive for those affected," said Vogel.
Vogel, who used to run the Solingen-Wuppertal employment agency, explained: "With the citizen's allowance, we want to enable those affected to earn more than they do today." This increases their chances of advancement because it makes their effort more worthwhile. "If, for example, a daughter or son of Hartz IV recipients starts an apprenticeship today, they are only allowed to keep 200 euros. In the future it should be over 600 euros," said Vogel. He continued: "Today, for example, Annika, who grows up in a Hartz IV family and works in a mini job, can only keep 184 euros of 520 euros. If Ayse, whose parents are financially independent, does the same mini job, then she can keep 520 euros."
Today, young people so often learn early in life that their effort is not worth it and that it makes little difference if they work. With parents in a difficult situation, they would have worse chances. "That triggers something in the minds of young people," said Vogel, who is also parliamentary director of the FDP parliamentary group. "It's the opposite of opportunities regardless of background." The citizen money should change this.
After the draft law by Labor Minister Hubertus Heil from the SPD did not get a majority in the Bundesrat, the mediation committee of the Bundesrat and Bundestag is to lash down a compromise this Wednesday. As was heard from the coalition, informal talks on this are already in full swing.