The lawyer who represents José Luis Moreno in the Titella case - the plot that, according to the police, directed the television producer and who allegedly scammed 85 million to banks - has caught the attention of the judge who instructs the matter for his delay in attending a Resource that the judicial investigation intends to be shipwranged.
In a letter, the defense complains about the little speed with which the magistrate has addressed his petition to file the cause for a procedural error and urges him to impulse.
"It does not consist provided the admission of such a resource (...) Despite the time elapsed since its presentation, more than 20 days, of the unequivocal gravity and relevance of the appeal, and that have been provided and resolved crowd of Writings and pretensions formulated on very later dates ", Razona.
Understand - as it insists "does not admit more delay". The defense, also, recalls the Judge Ismael Moreno that other challenged have also joined the request of him. Hence, he considers him, the need for the instructor to pronounce.
"He has to proceed with no greater delay at the momentum and that, as soon as possible, is provided to his admission and the scheduled course is given," he concludes.
In an appeal presented last September, the defense of the Showman requested that all the actions practiced by the researchers from 23, 2018 - which is when the Titella operation started - understanding that they came from a case That, in his opinion, another court had to annul for continuing to instruct the deadline.
The process referred to in the defense of the former ventriloquist is that of the denunciation presented by the leaders of Avanca before the 14th Instruction Court of Madrid, in which they alerted that they had been victims of the deception of a criminal organization that had achieved Substrar them 1,396,000 euros. It was, allegedly, the network led by the television producer. The cause was opened by scam and documentary falsehood.
This complaint made the Civil Guard and the National Police intervening, whose agents practiced new diligences in which they proved that, in addition to Abanca, the plot had also appropriated funds from other banking entities such as Liberbank, Ing, Bankinter and Bankia.
After proven the researchers, the magnitude of the investigations, they baptized the case as Titella and disconnected it from that initial complaint. In viewing that the network had ramifications abroad, the matter ended in the central court of instruction number 2 of the national audience.
While Titella started walking, the instruction of Abanca was paralyzed. The first six months were sterile and, when they were consumed, as indicated by the lawyer in its appeal, the judge did not declare the complexity of the cause and, without doing so, agreed a new period for the 18-month instruction.
Then, in April 2019, the magistrate asked to inhibit the central court who investigates Titella. The Prosecutore His Opposition and the Judge rejected the inhibition but, finally, the Supreme Court ordered that it accumulated.
The lawyer maintains in his appeal that the magistrate of the Court of Instruction 14 was not correct, with which the Abanca case had to be dismissed. "All the actions agreed and practiced after the end of the period," the Moreno lawyer insists on him. "Since August 23, 2018, the cause is preluing, so that everything act after subsequently is null in a radical way," he says.
Soon after, the prosecution announced that it was going to oppose nullity by considering that the reasons made by the artist were a mere procedural error that could be corrected without invalidating the whole of research on the alleged macroestafa.
Date Of Update: 08 October 2021, 09:01
