The clue is actually in the ROTOR's self-reporting. In 2014 and 2015, published in dagens nyheter for a series of articles from the opposite point of view. It is focused on the ”case of Maria” which is the DN was involved in. The headlines speak for themselves: ”Svalöv and took the three-year girl and her mother,” ”Mary, I want to be home with my baby girl,” and ”the Mother has been given custody of her daughter, but still chased her.”
as the girl had been familjehemsplacerad for several years, claimed her mother to be reunited with her daughter. It is, therefore, in this case the DN posted a series of distressing the items, if a clear edge directed towards the social services in Svalöv, that is, as in the case of the Little Heart was fighting against it.
a number of well-known intellectuals has been on the move
a number of commentators have, like me, the reaction of the ROTOR's turn, including the key voices in this debate, as the Jenny in the Other, and Malin Lernfelt. We have already pushed the opposite line - that the best interests of the child must come first - remember that is how the destructive nature of DN's articles were critical when the Hakan Ceders inquiry on the involuntary commitment of a child would be completed.
READ MORE: it's Too late for the heart, but the other children might be saved. READ MORE: it's Better to be moving than being shifted between strangersUpdated Date: 10 March 2020, 12:00