The Aeroline Plus Ultra places the judge who has suspended his rescue in the test of provoking a loss of 19 million to the state and a jaca to his template. In a written dated last day 19, the one who has had access to the world, the airline warns of drama if it does not receive 34 million pending.
"The absence of disbursement from the participatory loan that was also awarded would inevitably condemn Plus Ultra Airlines, S.A., to a dramatic financial situation with enormous difficulties to deal with payment obligations contracted", it comes to say. And among those "payment obligations contracted" highlight the 19 million that has already given the so-called Solvency Support Fund for Strategic Enterprises of the State 2%.
After this written of plea, advanced by a populi voice, the airline prepares another with a similar content of explaining why the rescue needs, with it he puts the judge that he has the case, hope collazos, in the test of provoking, according to Plus Ultra, a detriment to the State braking the second part of the rescue and, in addition, a loss of employment. "The participatory loan to disburse is a fundamental pillar for the financial sustainability of the Company, an essential element to enable the continuation of our activity and the maintenance of employment that it entails it," she says. The airline ensures that it needs the money to maintain "the 354 direct positions and more than 2,500 indirect than the airline generates in Spain".
The airline maintains the same line of defense that the state advocacy that, as published this newspaper on Thursday, also warned the judge that the suspension of the rescue left the return of 19 million in the air. "It seems a fact that does not proceed with the disbursement of the pending loan, would make the return of the 19 million euros and disbursed when the budgets have been designed on the company's viability plan", according to the law of advocacy. of the State.
Plus Ultra submits that its feasibility plan based on receiving from the state a total of 53 million and that if it does not receive the thick one runs out of the key pillar.
However, the judge has so far from both parties and has chosen to stop the rescue precisely to protect public accounts at the lack of justification, in his opinion, the rescue of this airline. "The unpreceded delivery would mean an important patrimonial impairment without the possibility of restoration to a previous situation," she said in her rescue suspension car. The airline has a few days to try to convince the instructor and the prosecutor, which also asks to accredit the need for money. The Popular Party and VOX, personally in the 15th Instruction Court, ask for the precautionary suspension of the operation.Date Of Update: 25 July 2021, 06:08